You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Utilisation of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners within maternity care provision: results from a nationally representative cohort study of 1,835 pregnant women
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-12-146 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amie Steel, Jon Adams, David Sibbritt, Alex Broom, Cindy Gallois, Jane Frawley |
Abstract |
There is little known about women's concurrent use of conventional and complementary health care during pregnancy, particularly consultation patterns with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This study examines health service utilisation among pregnant women including consultations with obstetricians, midwives, general practitioners (GPs) and CAM practitioners. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 15% |
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
France | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 140 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 20% |
Student > Master | 26 | 18% |
Researcher | 13 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
Lecturer | 8 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 19% |
Unknown | 28 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 32% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 31% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 31 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#963,799
of 24,410,879 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#186
of 4,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,660
of 287,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#4
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,410,879 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.