| Title |
The impact of an electronic health questionnaire on symptom management and behavior reporting for breast cancer survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-012-2150-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meredith Bock, Dan Moore, Jimmy Hwang, Dianne Shumay, Laurell Lawson, Deborah Hamolsky, Laura Esserman, Hope Rugo, A. Jo Chien, John Park, Pamela Munster, Michelle Melisko |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Colombia | 1 | 9% |
| Honduras | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2012.
All research outputs
#5,563,368
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,045
of 5,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,695
of 182,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#14
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.