↓ Skip to main content

Automated facial recognition and policing: a Bridge too far?

Overview of attention for article published in Legal Studies, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated facial recognition and policing: a Bridge too far?
Published in
Legal Studies, August 2021
DOI 10.1017/lst.2021.22
Authors

Joe Purshouse, Liz Campbell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Master 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 15%
Psychology 3 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#20,241,772
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Legal Studies
#347
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,530
of 436,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Legal Studies
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.