↓ Skip to main content

Coming Out for a Third Time: Transmen, Sexual Orientation, and Identity

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Coming Out for a Third Time: Transmen, Sexual Orientation, and Identity
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10508-012-0036-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Rowniak, Catherine Chesla

Abstract

Female-to-male (FTM) transgender persons are often assumed to have been lesbian in sexual orientation prior to transition and to have maintained a primary attraction for women after transition. However, limited research and anecdotal information from clinicians who work with FTM have indicated that many identify as gay men post-transition. This article described the results of a qualitative study that employed interviews with 17 FTM in order to understand their experience of transition and sexual orientation. Of the 17 participants, seven identified as lesbian prior to transition, three as heterosexual, and seven as bisexual or queer. After transition, 10 identified as gay men and the remaining seven identified as bisexual or queer. Four patterns of sexual behavior emerged from the data and were described and discussed. These patterns were named steadfast, aligned, shifted, and fluid. These findings bring additional options to the belief that there are two distinct types of transgender: a homosexual subtype and a nonhomosexual subtype.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 79 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 26%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,868,940
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#919
of 3,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,857
of 286,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.