| Title |
Unilateral Versus Bilateral Prostatic Arterial Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients with Prostate Enlargement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-012-0528-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tiago Bilhim, João Pisco, Hugo Rio Tinto, Lúcia Fernandes, Luís Campos Pinheiro, Marisa Duarte, José A. Pereira, António G. Oliveira, João O’Neill |
| Abstract |
This study was designed to compare baseline data and clinical outcome between patients with prostate enlargement/benign prostatic hyperplasia (PE/BPH) who underwent unilateral and bilateral prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) for the relief of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 35% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 70% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2012.
All research outputs
#18,323,689
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#2,103
of 2,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,407
of 278,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.