↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced Access to Early Visual Processing of Perceptual Simultaneity in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Enhanced Access to Early Visual Processing of Perceptual Simultaneity in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1735-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine M. Falter, Sven Braeutigam, Roger Nathan, Sarah Carrington, Anthony J. Bailey

Abstract

We compared judgements of the simultaneity or asynchrony of visual stimuli in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and typically-developing controls using Magnetoencephalography (MEG). Two vertical bars were presented simultaneously or non-simultaneously with two different stimulus onset delays. Participants with ASD distinguished significantly better between real simultaneity (0 ms delay between two stimuli) and apparent simultaneity (17 ms delay between two stimuli) than controls. In line with the increased sensitivity, event-related MEG activity showed increased differential responses for simultaneity versus apparent simultaneity. The strongest evoked potentials, observed over occipital cortices at about 130 ms, were correlated with performance differences in the ASD group only. Superior access to early visual brain processes in ASD might underlie increased resolution of visual events in perception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Professor 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 38%
Neuroscience 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,153,620
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,300
of 5,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,708
of 292,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#31
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.