You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Who Speaks for Baltimore: The Invisibility of Whiteness and the Ethics of Oral History Theater
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oral History Review, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1080/00940798.2021.1943463 |
| Authors |
Mary Rizzo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 57% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 63% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 20% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,656,681
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Oral History Review
#13
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,375
of 436,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oral History Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them