| Title |
The digital literacy debate: an investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational technology research and development, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-010-9151-8 |
| Authors |
Angelique Nasah, Boaventura DaCosta, Carolyn Kinsell, Soonhwa Seok |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Turkey | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 252 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 26 | 9% |
| Researcher | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 66 | 24% |
| Unknown | 49 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 115 | 42% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 19 | 7% |
| Psychology | 14 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,373,029
of 25,016,456 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#347
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,142
of 175,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,016,456 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them