| Title |
Cannabinol and cannabidiol exert opposing effects on rat feeding patterns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-012-2697-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan A. Farrimond, Benjamin J. Whalley, Claire M. Williams |
| Abstract |
Increased food consumption following ∆(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced cannabinoid type 1 receptor agonism is well documented. However, possible non-∆(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol phytocannabinoid-induced feeding effects have yet to be fully investigated. Therefore, we have assessed the effects of the individual phytocannabinoids, cannabigerol, cannabidiol and cannabinol, upon feeding behaviors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Iceland | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 22% |
| Unknown | 68 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 285. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#125,998
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#33
of 5,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#507
of 176,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.