↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Coercion in Men and Women: Similar Behaviors, Different Predictors

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Sexual Coercion in Men and Women: Similar Behaviors, Different Predictors
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10508-009-9481-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Schatzel-Murphy, Danielle A. Harris, Raymond A. Knight, Michael A. Milburn

Abstract

A growing body of literature supports the contention that both women and men employ various seductive, manipulative, intoxication, and even forceful tactics of sexual coercion to obtain sexual contact from unwilling partners. Although the self-reported coercive behavior of men and women may appear similar in many respects, predictors of such behavior seem to vary in important ways across gender. In addition to examining the prevalence of coercive behaviors reported across gender, the present study examined the extent to which four variables found in models of male sexual coercion predicted self-reported use of sexual coercion in a sample (n = 186) of college men and women: prior sexual abuse, sexual dominance, sociosexuality, and sexual compulsivity. Although prior sexual abuse seemed to be part of a cycle of sexual coercion among both men and women, key predictors of sexual coercion among men were sexual dominance and sociosexuality, whereas the key predictor of sexual coercion among women was sexual compulsivity. These findings support the notion that whereas men may behave coercively to obtain or maintain an impersonal sense of power and control, women may behave coercively to achieve some level of interpersonal connection when feeling out of control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 108 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 56 49%
Social Sciences 24 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#13,441,578
of 24,027,644 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,514
of 3,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,427
of 96,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,027,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.