↓ Skip to main content

Perceived exertion as a tool to self-regulate exercise in individuals with tetraplegia

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Perceived exertion as a tool to self-regulate exercise in individuals with tetraplegia
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00421-012-2426-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas A. W. Paulson, Nicolette C. Bishop, Christof A. Leicht, Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the use of subjective rating of perceived exertion (RPE) as a tool to self-regulate the intensity of wheelchair propulsive exercise in individuals with tetraplegia. Eight motor complete tetraplegic (C5/6 and below; ASIA Impairment Scale = A) participants completed a submaximal incremental exercise test followed by a graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak oxygen uptake (VO₂(peak)) on a wheelchair ergometer. On a separate day, a 20-min exercise bout was completed at an individualised imposed power output (PO) equating to 70 % of VO₂(peak). On a third occasion, participants were instructed to maintain a workload equivalent to the average RPE for the 20-min imposed condition. VO₂(peak), heart rate (HR) and PO were measured at 1-min intervals and blood lactate concentration [BLa(-)] was measured at 0, 10 and 20 min. No differences (P > 0.17) were found between mean VO₂(peak), % VO₂(peak), HR, % HR(peak), [BLa(-)], velocity or PO between the imposed and RPE-regulated trials. No significant (P > 0.05) time-by-trial interaction was present for VO₂(peak) data. A significant interaction (P < 0.001) for the PO data represented a trend for an increase in PO from 10 min to the end of exercise during the RPE-regulated condition. However, post hoc analysis revealed none of the differences in PO across time were significant (P > 0.05). In conclusion, these findings suggest that RPE can be an effective tool for self-regulating 20 min of wheelchair propulsion in a group of trained participants with tetraplegia who are experienced in wheelchair propulsion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 38 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,783,193
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,792
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,937
of 178,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.