↓ Skip to main content

Ineffective neutralization of the SARS-CoV-2 Mu variant by convalescent and vaccine sera

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 5,062)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
46 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
12062 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ineffective neutralization of the SARS-CoV-2 Mu variant by convalescent and vaccine sera
Published in
bioRxiv, September 2021
DOI 10.1101/2021.09.06.459005
Authors

Keiya Uriu, Izumi Kimura, Kotaro Shirakawa, Akifumi Takaori-Kondo, Taka-aki Nakada, Atsushi Kaneda, The Genotype to Phenotype Japan Consortium, So Nakagawa, Kei Sato

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12,062 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5604. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#657
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#3
of 5,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57
of 436,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.