↓ Skip to main content

Peer-Education Intervention to Reduce Injection Risk Behaviors Benefits High-Risk Young Injection Drug Users: A Latent Transition Analysis of the CIDUS 3/DUIT Study

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Peer-Education Intervention to Reduce Injection Risk Behaviors Benefits High-Risk Young Injection Drug Users: A Latent Transition Analysis of the CIDUS 3/DUIT Study
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10461-012-0373-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary E. Mackesy-Amiti, Lorna Finnegan, Lawrence J. Ouellet, Elizabeth T. Golub, Holly Hagan, Sharon M. Hudson, Mary H. Latka, Richard S. Garfein

Abstract

We analyzed data from a large randomized HIV/HCV prevention intervention trial with young injection drug users (IDUs) conducted in five U.S. cities. The trial compared a peer education intervention (PEI) with a time-matched, attention control group. Applying categorical latent variable analysis (mixture modeling) to baseline injection risk behavior data, we identified four distinct classes of injection-related HIV/HCV risk: low risk, non-syringe equipment-sharing, moderate-risk syringe-sharing, and high-risk syringe-sharing. The trial participation rate did not vary across classes. We conducted a latent transition analysis using trial baseline and 6-month follow-up data, to test the effect of the intervention on transitions to the low-risk class at follow-up. Adjusting for gender, age, and race/ethnicity, a significant intervention effect was found only for the high-risk class. Young IDU who exhibited high-risk behavior at baseline were 90% more likely to be in the low-risk class at follow-up after the PEI intervention, compared to the control group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 17%
Social Sciences 19 16%
Psychology 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 33 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,763,929
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#695
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,174
of 182,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#7
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.