↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Intake of Magnesium May Modulate Depression

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Dietary Intake of Magnesium May Modulate Depression
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12011-012-9568-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teymoor Yary, Sanaz Aazami, Kourosh Soleimannejad

Abstract

Depressive symptoms are frequent in students and may lead to countless problems. Several hypotheses associate magnesium with depression because of the presence of this mineral in several enzymes, hormones, and neurotransmitters, which may play a key role in the pathological pathways of depression. The aim of this study was to assess whether magnesium intake could modulate depressive symptoms. A cross-sectional study was conducted on a convenience sample of 402 Iranian postgraduate students studying in Malaysia to assess the relationship between magnesium intake and depressive symptoms. The mean age of the participants was 32.54 ± 6.22 years. The results of the study demonstrated an inverse relationship between magnesium intake and depressive symptoms, which persisted even after adjustments for sex, age, body mass index, monthly expenses, close friends, living on campus, smoking (current and former), education, physical activity, and marital status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 40%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Psychology 7 8%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,093,926
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#154
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,352
of 279,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.