You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
透析時血管痛に著効したマイクロコーンによる耳介治療 : 3例報告
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.4009/jsdt.50.197 |
| Authors |
Shigeru Takeuchi, Yasuhiro Ohtsuka, Takashi Hayashi, Nobuo Nagano, Tetsuo Ando, Mitsuru Kobayashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#17,375,688
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#82
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,542
of 422,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.