You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of decreasing the proportion of higher energy foods and reducing portion sizes on food purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003743 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James P. Reynolds, Minna Ventsel, Daina Kosīte, Brier Rigby Dames, Laura Brocklebank, Sarah Masterton, Emily Pechey, Mark Pilling, Rachel Pechey, Gareth J. Hollands, Theresa M. Marteau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 44% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Guernsey | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 51% |
| Scientists | 21 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 345. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#94,540
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#238
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,687
of 434,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#9
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.