↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotics for persistent cough or wheeze following acute bronchiolitis in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotics for persistent cough or wheeze following acute bronchiolitis in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009834.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabrielle B McCallum, Peter S Morris, Anne B Chang

Abstract

Bronchiolitis is a common acute respiratory infectious condition, with a high prevalence worldwide. It is a clinically diagnosed syndrome, manifested by tachypnoea (rapid breathing), with crackles or wheeze in young children. In the acute phase of bronchiolitis (< 14 days), antibiotics have only been recommended when a secondary bacterial infection is suspected. Although bronchiolitis is usually a self-limiting condition, a number of children have persistent respiratory symptoms such as cough and wheezing in post-acute bronchiolitis, and they present or re-present to secondary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Other 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 21 30%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2013.
All research outputs
#3,239,318
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,998
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,420
of 287,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.