↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for Evolution Versus Evidence for Intelligent Design: Parallel Confusions

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Biology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for Evolution Versus Evidence for Intelligent Design: Parallel Confusions
Published in
Evolutionary Biology, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11692-010-9088-1
Authors

Kirk Fitzhugh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 9%
Germany 3 4%
United States 3 4%
Austria 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Iceland 1 1%
Unknown 56 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 59%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 4 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,561,111
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#192
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,281
of 95,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.