↓ Skip to main content

Sequestered defensive toxins in tetrapod vertebrates: principles, patterns, and prospects for future studies

Overview of attention for article published in Chemoecology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 239)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Sequestered defensive toxins in tetrapod vertebrates: principles, patterns, and prospects for future studies
Published in
Chemoecology, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00049-012-0112-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan H. Savitzky, Akira Mori, Deborah A. Hutchinson, Ralph A. Saporito, Gordon M. Burghardt, Harvey B. Lillywhite, Jerrold Meinwald

Abstract

Chemical defenses are widespread among animals, and the compounds involved may be either synthesized from nontoxic precursors or sequestered from an environmental source. Defensive sequestration has been studied extensively among invertebrates, but relatively few examples have been documented among vertebrates. Nonetheless, the number of described cases of defensive sequestration in tetrapod vertebrates has increased recently and includes diverse lineages of amphibians and reptiles (including birds). The best-known examples involve poison frogs, but other examples include natricine snakes that sequester toxins from amphibians and two genera of insectivorous birds. Commonalities among these diverse taxa include the combination of consuming toxic prey and exhibiting some form of passive defense, such as aposematism, mimicry, or presumptive death-feigning. Some species exhibit passive sequestration, in which dietary toxins simply require an extended period of time to clear from the tissues, whereas other taxa exhibit morphological or physiological specializations that enhance the uptake, storage, and/or delivery of exogenous toxins. It remains uncertain whether any sequestered toxins of tetrapods bioaccumulate across multiple trophic levels, but multitrophic accumulation seems especially likely in cases involving consumption of phytophagous or mycophagous invertebrates and perhaps consumption of poison frogs by snakes. We predict that additional examples of defensive toxin sequestration in amphibians and reptiles will be revealed by collaborations between field biologists and natural product chemists. Candidates for future investigation include specialized predators on mites, social insects, slugs, and toxic amphibians. Comprehensive studies of the ecological, evolutionary, behavioral, and regulatory aspects of sequestration will require teams of ecologists, systematists, ethologists, physiologists, molecular biologists, and chemists. The widespread occurrence of sequestered defenses has important implications for the ecology, evolution, and conservation of amphibians and reptiles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 171 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Student > Bachelor 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Researcher 22 12%
Professor 8 4%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Environmental Science 10 6%
Chemistry 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 37 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,820,123
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from Chemoecology
#13
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,785
of 173,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemoecology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.