↓ Skip to main content

Celiac Disease Revealed in 3% of Swedish 12‐year‐olds Born During an Epidemic

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
252 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Celiac Disease Revealed in 3% of Swedish 12‐year‐olds Born During an Epidemic
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, August 2009
DOI 10.1097/mpg.0b013e31818c52cc
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Myléus, Anneli Ivarsson, Charlotta Webb, Lars Danielsson, Olle Hernell, Lotta Högberg, Eva Karlsson, Carina Lagerqvist, Fredrik Norström, Anna Rosén, Olof Sandström, Lars Stenhammar, Hans Stenlund, Stig Wall, Annelie Carlsson

Abstract

Sweden experienced a marked epidemic of celiac disease between 1984 and 1996 in children younger than 2 years of age, partly explained by changes in infant feeding. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of celiac disease in 12-year-olds born during the epidemic (1993), including both symptomatic and screening detected cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 104 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Other 10 9%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 28 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,228,346
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#127
of 5,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,514
of 127,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.