You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gluten-free diet reduces adiposity, inflammation and insulin resistance associated with the induction of PPAR-alpha and PPAR-gamma expression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.08.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabíola Lacerda Pires Soares, Rafael de Oliveira Matoso, Lílian Gonçalves Teixeira, Zélia Menezes, Solange Silveira Pereira, Andréa Catão Alves, Nathália Vieira Batista, Ana Maria Caetano de Faria, Denise Carmona Cara, Adaliene Versiani Matos Ferreira, Jacqueline Isaura Alvarez-Leite |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 182 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 53 | 29% |
| Spain | 31 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 5% |
| Canada | 7 | 4% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 63 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 136 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 18% |
| Scientists | 8 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 12% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#181,408
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
#16
of 2,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,049
of 277,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.