↓ Skip to main content

Change in Cardiac Geometry and Function in CKD Children During Strict BP Control: A Randomized Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Change in Cardiac Geometry and Function in CKD Children During Strict BP Control: A Randomized Study
Published in
Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, November 2012
DOI 10.2215/cjn.08420811
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Chiara Matteucci, Marcello Chinali, Gabriele Rinelli, Elke Wühl, Aleksandra Zurowska, Marina Charbit, Giacomo Pongiglione, Franz Schaefer, the ESCAPE Trial Group

Abstract

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and abnormal systolic function are present in a high proportion of children with CKD. This study evaluated changes in left ventricular (LV) geometry and systolic function in children with mild to moderate CKD as an ancillary project of the Effect of Strict Blood Pressure Control and ACE Inhibition on Progression of Chronic Renal Failure in Pediatric Patients trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 21 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 28 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,239,459
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#2,299
of 4,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,626
of 201,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#15
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.