↓ Skip to main content

Delayed accumulation of intestinal coliform bacteria enhances life span and stress resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans fed respiratory deficient E. coli

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Delayed accumulation of intestinal coliform bacteria enhances life span and stress resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans fed respiratory deficient E. coli
Published in
BMC Microbiology, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-12-300
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Gomez, Gabriela C Monsalve, Vincent Tse, Ryoichi Saiki, Emily Weng, Laura Lee, Chandra Srinivasan, Alison R Frand, Catherine F Clarke

Abstract

Studies with the nematode model Caenorhabditis elegans have identified conserved biochemical pathways that act to modulate life span. Life span can also be influenced by the composition of the intestinal microbiome, and C. elegans life span can be dramatically influenced by its diet of Escherichia coli. Although C. elegans is typically fed the standard OP50 strain of E. coli, nematodes fed E. coli strains rendered respiratory deficient, either due to a lack coenzyme Q or the absence of ATP synthase, show significant life span extension. Here we explore the mechanisms accounting for the enhanced nematode life span in response to these diets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 15 9%
Other 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 6%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,557,505
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,652
of 3,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,062
of 285,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#49
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.