You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Six-Minute-Walk Test in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1164/rccm.201209-1596oc |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael I. Polkey, Martijn A. Spruit, Lisa D. Edwards, Michael L. Watkins, Victor Pinto-Plata, Jørgen Vestbo, Peter M. A. Calverley, Ruth Tal-Singer, Alvar Agustí, Per S. Bakke, Harvey O. Coxson, David A. Lomas, William MacNee, Stephen Rennard, Edwin K. Silverman, Bruce E. Miller, Courtney Crim, Julie Yates, Emiel F. M. Wouters, Bartolome Celli, on behalf of the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints Study Investigators |
| Abstract |
Outcomes other than spirometry are required to assess nonbronchodilator therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Estimates of the minimal clinically important difference for the 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD) have been derived from narrow cohorts using nonblinded intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 224 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 18% |
| Researcher | 30 | 13% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 60 | 26% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,378,062
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#2,024
of 12,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,324
of 288,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#9
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.