You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are we asking the right questions? Working with the LGBTQ+ community to prioritise healthcare research themes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-021-00298-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sally Crowe, Eleanor Barker, Meg Roberts, Lucy Lloyd, Clara M. de Barros, Ben Rebelo-Harris, Catherine Meads, Catherine L. Saunders |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 57% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 83% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,663,116
of 25,223,158 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#147
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,581
of 427,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,223,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.