↓ Skip to main content

HIV Diagnoses and Prevalence in the Southern Region of the United States, 2007–2010

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
HIV Diagnoses and Prevalence in the Southern Region of the United States, 2007–2010
Published in
Journal of Community Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10900-012-9633-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Prejean, Tian Tang, H. Irene Hall

Abstract

On a number of leading health indicators, including HIV disease, individuals in the southern states of the United States fare worse than those in other regions. We analyzed data on adults and adolescents diagnosed with HIV infection through December 2010, and reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through June 2011 from 46 states with confidential name-based HIV reporting since January 2007 to describe the impact of HIV in the South. In 2010 46.0 % of all new diagnoses of HIV infection occurred in the South. Compared to other regions, a higher percentage of diagnoses in the South were among women (23.8 %), blacks/African Americans (57.2 %), and among those in the heterosexual contact category (15.0 % for males; 88.5 % for females). From 2007 to 2010 the estimated number and rate of diagnoses of HIV infection decreased significantly in the South overall (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC] = -1.5 % [95 %CI -2.3 %, -0.7 %] and -2.1 % [95 % CI -4.0 %, -0.2 %], respectively) and among most groups of women, but there was no change in the number or rate of diagnoses of HIV infection among men overall. Significant decreases in men 30-39 and 40-49 years of age were offset by increases in young men 13-19 and 20-29 years of age. A continued focus on this area of high HIV burden is needed to yield success in the fight against HIV disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Social Sciences 9 23%
Psychology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2013.
All research outputs
#13,299,519
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#720
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,106
of 275,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.