| Title |
Understanding PT results for decays of τ-leptons into hadrons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physics of Particles and Nuclei, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1134/s1063779613020147 |
| Authors |
S. Groote, J. G. Körner, A. A. Pivovarov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,178,031
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Physics of Particles and Nuclei
#121
of 162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,986
of 197,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics of Particles and Nuclei
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.