↓ Skip to main content

Interactions between chemical and climate stressors: A role for mechanistic toxicology in assessing climate change risks

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
287 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactions between chemical and climate stressors: A role for mechanistic toxicology in assessing climate change risks
Published in
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/etc.2043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Hooper, Gerald T. Ankley, Daniel A. Cristol, Lindley A. Maryoung, Pamela D. Noyes, Kent E. Pinkerton

Abstract

Incorporation of global climate change (GCC) effects into assessments of chemical risk and injury requires integrated examinations of chemical and nonchemical stressors. Environmental variables altered by GCC (temperature, precipitation, salinity, pH) can influence the toxicokinetics of chemical absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion as well as toxicodynamic interactions between chemicals and target molecules. In addition, GCC challenges processes critical for coping with the external environment (water balance, thermoregulation, nutrition, and the immune, endocrine, and neurological systems), leaving organisms sensitive to even slight perturbations by chemicals when pushed to the limits of their physiological tolerance range. In simplest terms, GCC can make organisms more sensitive to chemical stressors, while alternatively, exposure to chemicals can make organisms more sensitive to GCC stressors. One challenge is to identify potential interactions between nonchemical and chemical stressors affecting key physiological processes in an organism. We employed adverse outcome pathways, constructs depicting linkages between mechanism-based molecular initiating events and impacts on individuals or populations, to assess how chemical- and climate-specific variables interact to lead to adverse outcomes. Case examples are presented for prospective scenarios, hypothesizing potential chemical-GCC interactions, and retrospective scenarios, proposing mechanisms for demonstrated chemical-climate interactions in natural populations. Understanding GCC interactions along adverse outcome pathways facilitates extrapolation between species or other levels of organization, development of hypotheses and focal areas for further research, and improved inputs for risk and resource injury assessments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 356 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 20%
Researcher 61 17%
Student > Master 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 73 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 28%
Environmental Science 101 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 101 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,116,593
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#418
of 5,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,748
of 294,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.