↓ Skip to main content

Outcome impact of goal directed fluid therapy during high risk abdominal surgery in low to moderate risk patients: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Outcome impact of goal directed fluid therapy during high risk abdominal surgery in low to moderate risk patients: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10877-012-9422-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davinder S. Ramsingh, Chirag Sanghvi, Joseph Gamboa, Maxime Cannesson, Richard L. Applegate

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 96 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 13 13%
Professor 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 9 9%
Other 30 30%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 62%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,158,001
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#254
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,508
of 294,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.