↓ Skip to main content

Tradeoffs in marine reserve design: habitat condition, representation, and socioeconomic costs

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tradeoffs in marine reserve design: habitat condition, representation, and socioeconomic costs
Published in
Conservation Letters, January 2013
DOI 10.1111/conl.12005
Authors

Carissa J. Klein, Vivitskaia J. Tulloch, Benjamin S. Halpern, Kimberly A. Selkoe, Matthew E. Watts, Charles Steinback, Astrid Scholz, Hugh P. Possingham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
American Samoa 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 155 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 24%
Researcher 34 21%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 9 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 61 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#230,107
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#68
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,528
of 292,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.