↓ Skip to main content

Pain in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: do characteristics differ in ulcerative and non-ulcerative subtypes?

Overview of attention for article published in International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Pain in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: do characteristics differ in ulcerative and non-ulcerative subtypes?
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00192-012-2003-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim A. Killinger, Judith A. Boura, Kenneth M. Peters

Abstract

Key differences between interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) subtypes (with and without Hunner's ulcer) have been noted. We hypothesized that pain characteristics in women grouped by IC/BPS subtype would differ.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Unspecified 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 20 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Unspecified 5 8%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1,978
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,681
of 286,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#24
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.