↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the tuberculosis programme in Ningxia Hui Autonomous region, the People’s Republic of China: a retrospective case study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of the tuberculosis programme in Ningxia Hui Autonomous region, the People’s Republic of China: a retrospective case study
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Rong Yang, Donald P McManus, Darren J Gray, Xiao Ling Wang, Shu Kun Yang, Allen G Ross, Gail M Williams, Magda K Ellis

Abstract

Tuberculosis is a devastating disease due to its rapid transmission and high rate of mortality. Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (NHAR), located in the North-west, is one of the poorest provinces in China and national surveys have shown TB has been hyper endemic in NHAR for several decades. As no active surveys had been undertaken since the initiation of the DOTS control program across all of NHAR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2013.
All research outputs
#18,325,190
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,770
of 14,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,872
of 280,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#262
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.