You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
休耕田を掘削して造成した湿地ビオトープにおける水生生物相
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology and Civil Engineering, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3825/ece.20-00038 |
| Authors |
中島 淳, 宮脇 崇 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 271 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 77 | 28% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Saint Barthélemy | 1 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 270 | 100% |
| Scientists | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#212,429
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#1
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,966
of 443,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them