↓ Skip to main content

副鼻腔侵襲性アスペルギルス症の脳血管浸潤による脳梗塞で死亡したと考えられた1 例

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Stroke, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
副鼻腔侵襲性アスペルギルス症の脳血管浸潤による脳梗塞で死亡したと考えられた1 例
Published in
Japanese Journal of Stroke, January 2019
DOI 10.3995/jstroke.10684
Authors

Hiroaki Ando, Jun-ichi Niwa, Masayuki Izumi, Naoki Nakao, Manabu Doyu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2021.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Stroke
#65
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#386,466
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Stroke
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.