↓ Skip to main content

Are symptoms of spirit possessed patients covered by the DSM-IV or DSM-5 criteria for possession trance disorder? A mixed-method explorative study in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Are symptoms of spirit possessed patients covered by the DSM-IV or DSM-5 criteria for possession trance disorder? A mixed-method explorative study in Uganda
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00127-012-0635-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjolein van Duijl, Wim Kleijn, Joop de Jong

Abstract

As in many cultures, spirit possession is a common idiom of distress in Uganda. The DSM-IV contains experimental research criteria for dissociative and possession trance disorder (DTD and PTD), which are under review for the DSM-5. In the current proposed categories of the DSM-5, PTD is subsumed under dissociative identity disorder (DID) and DTD under dissociative disorders not elsewhere classified. Evaluation of these criteria is currently urgently required. This study explores the match between local symptoms of spirit possession in Uganda and experimental research criteria for PTD in the DSM-IV and proposed criteria for DID in the DSM-5.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,292,379
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#233
of 2,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,777
of 290,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.