↓ Skip to main content

‘Autistic’ Local Processing Bias also Found in Children Gifted in Realistic Drawing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
‘Autistic’ Local Processing Bias also Found in Children Gifted in Realistic Drawing
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0923-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer E. Drake, Amanda Redash, Katelyn Coleman, Jennifer Haimson, Ellen Winner

Abstract

We investigated whether typically-developing children with a gift for drawing realistically show the local processing bias seen in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Twenty-seven 6-12 year-olds made an observational drawing (scored for level of realism) and completed three local processing tasks, and parents completed the Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test (CAST). Drawing score predicted local processing performance on all tasks independently of verbal IQ, age, and years of art lessons. Drawing score also predicted more frequent repetitive behaviors as assessed by the CAST. Thus, skill in realistic drawing is associated with a strong local processing bias and a tendency towards repetitive behaviors, showing that traits found in individuals with ASD irrespective of artistic talent are also found in typically developing children with artistic talent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 94 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Other 26 25%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 45%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2012.
All research outputs
#16,188,009
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4,003
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,874
of 169,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#29
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.