You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors affecting effective communication between registered nurses and adult cancer patients in an inpatient setting: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports , May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00212.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li Hui Tay, Desley Hegney, Emily Ang |
| Abstract |
To establish the best available evidence regarding the factors affecting effective communication between registered nurses and inpatient cancer adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 223 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 25% |
| Unknown | 56 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Psychology | 18 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 64 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports
#346
of 428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,177
of 123,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.