You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Schistosome infection in Senegal is associated with different spatial extents of risk and ecological drivers for Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009712 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Isabel J. Jones, Susanne H. Sokolow, Andrew J. Chamberlin, Andrea J. Lund, Nicolas Jouanard, Lydie Bandagny, Raphaël Ndione, Simon Senghor, Anne-Marie Schacht, Gilles Riveau, Skylar R. Hopkins, Jason R. Rohr, Justin V. Remais, Kevin D. Lafferty, Armand M. Kuris, Chelsea L. Wood, Giulio De Leo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Australia | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 29% |
Librarian | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,249,838
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#4,209
of 9,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,533
of 437,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#71
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.