Title |
Impact assessment of malaria vector control using routine surveillance data in Zambia: implications for monitoring and evaluation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-11-437 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emmanuel Chanda, Michael Coleman, Immo Kleinschmidt, Janet Hemingway, Busiku Hamainza, Freddie Masaninga, Pascalina Chanda-Kapata, Kumar S Baboo, David N Dürrheim, Marlize Coleman |
Abstract |
Malaria vector control using long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), with pyrethroids and DDT, to reduce malaria transmission has been expansively implemented in Zambia. The impact of these interventions on malaria morbidity and mortality has not previously been formally assessed at the population level in Zambia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Rwanda | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 154 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 35 | 22% |
Student > Master | 35 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
Lecturer | 11 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 18% |
Unknown | 19 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,897,265
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,206
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,648
of 289,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#21
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.