↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of acute cough/lower respiratory tract infection by antibiotic class and associated outcomes: a 13 European country observational study in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of acute cough/lower respiratory tract infection by antibiotic class and associated outcomes: a 13 European country observational study in primary care
Published in
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), September 2010
DOI 10.1093/jac/dkq336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher C. Butler, Kerenza Hood, Mark J. Kelly, Herman Goossens, Theo Verheij, Paul Little, Hasse Melbye, Antoni Torres, Sigvard Mölstad, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Jordi Almirall, Francesco Blasi, Tom Schaberg, Peter Edwards, Ulla-Maija Rautakorpi, Helena Hupkova, Joseph Wood, Jacqui Nuttall, Samuel Coenen

Abstract

Acute cough/lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is one of the commonest reasons for consulting and antibiotic prescribing. There are theoretical reasons why treatment with particular antibiotic classes may aid recovery more than others, but empirical, pragmatic evidence is lacking. We investigated whether treatment with a particular antibiotic class (amoxicillin) was more strongly associated with symptom score resolution and time to patients reporting recovery than each of eight other antibiotic classes or no antibiotic treatment for acute cough/LRTI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 46 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Professor 3 6%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 47%
Computer Science 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#5,594
of 8,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,977
of 106,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#38
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.