You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Then and now: hypes and hopes of regenerative medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Biotechnology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annabelle S. Slingerland, Anthal I.P.M. Smits, Carlijn V.C. Bouten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 25% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 27% |
| Engineering | 9 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#2,494
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,472
of 289,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#29
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.