| Title |
Bringing scientific rigor to community-developed programs in Hong Kong
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1129 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cecilia S Fabrizio, Malia R Hirschmann, Tai Hing Lam, Teresa Cheung, Irene Pang, Sophia Chan, Sunita M Stewart |
| Abstract |
This paper describes efforts to generate evidence for community-developed programs to enhance family relationships in the Chinese culture of Hong Kong, within the framework of community-based participatory research (CBPR). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Librarian | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,260,208
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,263
of 14,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,190
of 280,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#230
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.