You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Construct Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in People With Chronic Neck Pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroshi Takasaki, Julia Treleaven |
| Abstract |
To investigate an appropriate scoring system and unidimensionality using Rasch analysis, discriminant validity, and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) in people with chronic neck pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 18% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#4,310
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,505
of 288,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#75
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.