You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants on mRNA vaccine-induced immunity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-04085-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carolina Lucas, Chantal B. F. Vogels, Inci Yildirim, Jessica E. Rothman, Peiwen Lu, Valter Monteiro, Jeff R. Gehlhausen, Melissa Campbell, Julio Silva, Alexandra Tabachnikova, Mario A. Peña-Hernandez, M. Catherine Muenker, Mallery I. Breban, Joseph R. Fauver, Subhasis Mohanty, Jiefang Huang, Albert C. Shaw, Albert I. Ko, Saad B. Omer, Nathan D. Grubaugh, Akiko Iwasaki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,782 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 285 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 112 | 6% |
Spain | 41 | 2% |
Mexico | 41 | 2% |
Canada | 32 | 2% |
Japan | 28 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 27 | 2% |
Brazil | 26 | 1% |
Australia | 21 | 1% |
Other | 253 | 14% |
Unknown | 916 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1448 | 81% |
Scientists | 215 | 12% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 94 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 24 | 1% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
Professor | 10 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 13% |
Unknown | 71 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 11% |
Unknown | 77 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1245. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#11,241
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,132
of 98,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#403
of 440,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#42
of 997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.