↓ Skip to main content

Effects of working memory training in young and old adults

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
Title
Effects of working memory training in young and old adults
Published in
Memory & Cognition, December 2012
DOI 10.3758/s13421-012-0280-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia C. von Bastian, Nicolas Langer, Lutz Jäncke, Klaus Oberauer

Abstract

Many cognitive abilities, including working memory and reasoning ability, decline with progressing age. In this study, we investigated whether four weeks of intensive working memory training would enhance working memory and reasoning performance in an age-comparative setting. Groups of 34 young (19-36 years) and 27 older (62-77 years) adults practiced tasks representing the three functional categories in the facet model of working memory capacity: storage and processing, relational integration, and supervision. The data were compared to those of a young and an old active control group who practiced tasks with low working memory demands. A cognitive test battery measuring near and far transfer was administered before and after training. Both age groups showed increased working memory performance in the trained tasks and in one structurally similar, but nontrained, task. Young adults also improved in a task measuring word-position binding in working memory. However, we found no far transfer to reasoning in either age group. The results provide evidence that working memory performance can be improved throughout the life span. However, in contrast to a previous study in which each facet of working memory capacity was trained separately, the present study showed that training multiple functional categories simultaneously induces less transfer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Poland 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 233 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 20%
Student > Master 34 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 12%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 55 22%
Unknown 36 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 134 54%
Neuroscience 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 50 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,472,508
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#288
of 1,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,603
of 292,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.