↓ Skip to main content

前駆すべりと地震の最終的サイズとの関係

Overview of attention for article published in Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan), January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
前駆すべりと地震の最終的サイズとの関係
Published in
Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan), January 2005
DOI 10.4294/zisin1948.58.3_231
Authors

吉田 真吾, 加藤 尚之

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 67%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan)
#60
of 446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,920
of 151,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan)
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.