↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiology and treatment of diabetic retinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Diabetologica, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Pathophysiology and treatment of diabetic retinopathy
Published in
Acta Diabetologica, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00592-012-0449-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Bandello, Rosangela Lattanzio, Ilaria Zucchiatti, Claudia Del Turco

Abstract

In the past years, the management of diabetic retinopathy (DR) relied primarily on a good systemic control of diabetes mellitus, and as soon as the severity of the vascular lesions required further treatment, laser photocoagulation or vitreoretinal surgery was done to the patient. Currently, even if the intensive metabolic control is still mandatory, a variety of different clinical strategies could be offered to the patient. The recent advances in understanding the complex pathophysiology of DR allowed the physician to identify many cell types involved in the pathogenesis of DR and thus to develop new treatment approaches. Vasoactive and proinflammatory molecules, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), play a key role in this multifactorial disease. Current properly designed trials, evaluating agents targeting VEGF or other mediators, showed benefits in the management of DR, especially when metabolic control is lacking. Other agents, directing to the processes of vasopermeability and angiogenesis, are under investigations, giving more hope in the future management of this still sight-threatening disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 18%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 36 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,826,728
of 23,661,575 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#172
of 940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,719
of 285,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,661,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.