| Title |
Features of High Quality Discharge Planning for Patients Following Acute Myocardial Infarction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-2234-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily J. Cherlin, Leslie A. Curry, Jennifer W. Thompson, S. Ryan Greysen, Erica Spatz, Harlan M. Krumholz, Elizabeth H. Bradley |
| Abstract |
Hospital discharge planning is required as a Medicare Condition of Participation (CoP), and is essential to the health and safety for all patients. However, there have been no studies examining specific hospital discharge processes, such as patient education and communication with primary care providers, in relation to hospital 30-day risk standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#14,223,569
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,262
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,654
of 287,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#28
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.