↓ Skip to main content

Long‐term follow‐up of children with high‐risk neuroblastoma: The ENSG5 trial experience

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Blood and Cancer, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long‐term follow‐up of children with high‐risk neuroblastoma: The ENSG5 trial experience
Published in
Pediatric Blood and Cancer, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/pbc.24452
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Moreno, Sucheta J. Vaidya, C. Ross Pinkerton, Ian J. Lewis, John Imeson, David Machin, Andrew D. J. Pearson, on behalf of the European Neuroblastoma Study Group and the Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group

Abstract

Therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma is intensive and multimodal, and significant long-term adverse effects have been described. The aim of this study was to identify the nature and severity of late complications of metastatic neuroblastoma survivors included in the ENSG5 clinical trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Other 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 18 26%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2013.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Blood and Cancer
#3,897
of 6,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,441
of 289,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Blood and Cancer
#34
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.