↓ Skip to main content

Planting methods matter for cost‐effective rainforest restoration

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Management & Restoration, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Planting methods matter for cost‐effective rainforest restoration
Published in
Ecological Management & Restoration, December 2012
DOI 10.1111/emr.12017
Authors

Noel D. Preece, Penny van Oosterzee, Michael J. Lawes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Panama 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Researcher 6 15%
Other 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Design 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#16,752,019
of 24,641,327 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Management & Restoration
#316
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,141
of 287,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Management & Restoration
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.